Interesting to consider the value that we hold that the word usually brings to mind negative connotations, there is no harm in having a thing entirely. It means to live it fully, penetrate deeper.

Objects can be owned but also the people! In the act of love enters the heart of the beloved and in the sexual sphere it is possible to be penetrated and to penetrate.

It is not just the physical penetration of a body segment, is an act of fusion that gives us' the opportunity to share something that goes beyond the simple matter. During the sexual act so we can absorb and give something intangible to another.

Let you have to own and this is an entirely female but you have to be hand held and this is a very masculine way.

It 'still nice to see that it is not' can be held without a surrender to such ownership. It 's not so in this sense can impose violence. Not only that, not' can be held without possessing and not 'can possess without being possessed. It' s not a game of rhetoric but a simple law.

It 's a concept of belonging, when two lovers are said to have yours, it means you are a part of it, represents a principle of unity and therefore can only be positive. In this sense is to have a principle of love.

Do not confuse the possession but with the attachment or dependence or submission. If we also look in dictionaries as a synonym have expected to enjoy, are the possessions of material goods is usually but not always, in fact you can own an art, a talent.

Very different however is the insane desire of some individuals to subjugate others. In this case the submission may be physical or mental, but is always guided by the desire to hear the other employee, to make your slave, in every sense. Through this mode is established in a subdued sense of inferiority and dependence and dominant a sense of sadistic as illusory power over that being.

This ratio is what might be seen as the exact reversal of the principle of union is not merge into one another, and crush each other and can go up to the total destruction and complete loss of freedom to be themselves.

E 'primarily a form of violence that the subject suffers against his will, where the inability to rebel against sottomissone is usually tied to the fear of being alone, and then to feel incompetent or insecure.

There are many nuances of this relationship on several levels, mainly on the mental, in which the dominant is one who earns the money. It is no longer a relationship of love but of convenience.

But in severe cases the rulers are so strong to use blackmail, they feel the subject or the people dearest to him in danger and in doing so are sure to prevent any rebellion.

In these situations, physical violence to conduct the orchestra and are subject to a lot of energy and courage to get help to get out of this prison and finally start to live and breathe freedom.

And finally I steal from the movie Braveheart, this sentence: "Your heart and 'free: follow it,' cause it's worth it!

Related articles:

• Sex games
• Overwhelmed by an Unusual Destiny in the Blue Sea of August
• The female orgasm: a universe to be discovered
• Too little sex

Tags: being possessed , possession , sexuality , submit

Article published by Cathe on 07/17/2009 at 8:00 am in the category Articles . You can check out the comments to this entry through the feed RSS 2.0 . You can leave a response , or trackback a call from your own site.